Testy Copy Editors

Our new website is up and running at testycopyeditors.org. This board will be maintained as an archive. Please visit the new site and register. Direct questions to the proprietor, blanp@testycopyeditors.org
It is currently Tue Apr 16, 2024 3:45 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: No "Marxist" category?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 3:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2002 1:01 am
Posts: 8342
Location: Bethesda, Md.
Those convinced that liberals make up a disproportionate share of newsroom workers have long relied on Pew Research Center surveys to confirm this view, and they will not be disappointed by the results of Pew's latest study released today.
While most of the [547 surveyed] journalists, like many Americans, describe themselves as "moderate," a far higher number are "liberal" than in the general population.
At national organizations (which includes print, TV and radio), the numbers break down like this: 34% liberal, 7% conservative. At local outlets: 23% liberal, 12% conservative. At Web sites: 27% call themselves liberals, 13% conservatives.
This contrasts with the self-assessment of the general public: 20% liberal, 33% conservative.
(Editor & Publisher)<p>***Forgetting for the moment that the labels are essentially meaningless, why would anyone respond to such a survey?***<p>[ June 03, 2004: Message edited by: blanp ]</p>


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: No "Marxist" category?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2004 12:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 12:01 am
Posts: 37
Location: San Francisco, Calif.
No one did, they had Jayson Blair write the report.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: No "Marxist" category?
PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2004 9:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 12:01 am
Posts: 101
Location: Inner Baltimore
<blockquote><font size="1" face="TImes, TimesNR, serif">quote:</font><hr>Originally posted by blanp:
***Forgetting for the moment that the labels are essentially meaningless, why would anyone respond to such a survey?***<hr></blockquote><p>Probably because the survey includes questions about other, more relevant and timely concerns -- quality of coverage, accuracy and accountability in reporting, differences in various media, the direction of journalism in general, etc. <p>True, though, you'd think people could just skip that question (only 5% chose not to answer). Here's the link to the questionnaire. I think it's pretty interesting.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

What They're Saying




Useful Links