Language Log has a link to a
new blog at Oxford University Press with information about ***concepting*** and its search for a berth in the dictionary. The blogger is Ben Zimmer:
Quote:
That’s the true test of whether lexicographers think a new word should get some space on a dictionary page: are people using it in a variety of contexts, and does it look like it’s sticking around for a while? Lobbying campaigns for a particular term don’t work without proof that a broad array of people are actually making use of the word and will probably continue to do so. (Oxford English Dictionary editor-at-large Jesse Sheidlower discussed one such campaign in
Slate last year, when a copywriter launched a quixotic quest to get dictionary recognition for his pet word concepting.)
Then there was this later section of the blog. Brace yourselves, testy editors, for ever wider acceptance of "mic:"
Quote:
Everyone likes being on the ground floor of a new phenomenon, and neologisms are no exception. At the recent biennial conference of the Dictionary Society of North America in Chicago, conference organizer (and OUP chief consulting editor for American dictionaries) Erin McKean invited members of the public to bring their coinages to a “New Word Open Mic,†with a panel of lexicographers weighing in on which words seemed to have the best odds for making it into a dictionary some day.