Testy Copy Editors

Our new website is up and running at testycopyeditors.org. This board will be maintained as an archive. Please visit the new site and register. Direct questions to the proprietor, blanp@testycopyeditors.org
It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 3:37 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Why wait? Vanguard.com wants you
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2002 12:01 am
Posts: 485
Location: San Jose, CA
Tired sitting on the sidelines as the investment community takes our business apart piece by piece?

Here's your chance for a front-row seat: Copy desk chief at Vanguard.com: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ACESjobs/message/2340


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why wait? Vanguard.com wants you
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 12:04 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2002 12:01 am
Posts: 1775
Location: Baltimore
That would be one way to keep an eye on my 401(k).


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:30 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 1:01 am
Posts: 178
Location: DC
Quote:
Employment is contingent on a successful drug-screening result ...


Do any of your employers require a drug test? I haven't come across one yet in my career.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 4:44 am
Posts: 172
Location: Colorado Springs
I was drug-tested in Arkansas. My ex was tested in Palm Springs. My first newspaper job was part-time only, so I wasn't required to have a drug test. But they would have for a full-time gig.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 6:47 pm
Posts: 1734
Location: Washington
Yep, I've had to pee in a cup for each of my last three employers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 4:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2002 12:01 am
Posts: 485
Location: San Jose, CA
I think I've done the pee test everywhere I've gone.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 12:01 am
Posts: 376
Location: Southern California
I was drug tested before being hired, as well. It turns up in job ads with enough frequency for me to think it's quite common.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 1:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:15 am
Posts: 1432
Location: Alabamer
subtle_body wrote:
Quote:
Employment is contingent on a successful drug-screening result ...


Do any of your employers require a drug test? I haven't come across one yet in my career.


Wow. I was beginning to think the opposite. I've worked at two corporate cover-your-ass-focused places that required it. Really regret that I couldn't show some spine and refuse to work for a company that drug-tests journalists.

I get more anti-drug by the day, but nothing justifies that intrusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2007 7:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 12:01 am
Posts: 575
Location: Mass.
From here
Quote:
# In a study of high tech industries, researchers found that "drug testing programs do not succeed in improving productivity. Surprisingly, companies adopting drug testing programs are found to exhibit lower levels of productivity than their counterparts that do not... Both pre-employment and random testing of workers are found to be associated with lower levels of productivity."

Source: Shepard, Edward M., and Thomas J. Clifton, Drug Testing and Labor Productivity: Estimates Applying a Production Function Model, Institute of Industrial Relations, Research Paper No. 18, Le Moyne University, Syracuse, NY (1998), p. 1.

# It is estimated that the United States spends $1 billion annually to drug test about 20 million workers.

Source: Shepard, Edward M., and Thomas J. Clifton, Drug Testing and Labor Productivity: Estimates Applying a Production Function Model, Institute of Industrial Relations, Research Paper No. 18, Le Moyne University, Syracuse, NY (1998), p. 8.
What's needed is testing for stupid management.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:03 am
Posts: 1224
Location: Japan
Docsdoctor wrote:
What's needed is testing for stupid management.


They go by the honor system there, Docs, and take your word for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 12:01 am
Posts: 3137
Location: Homebush NSW Australia
The company condemns itself.

Ps: this condition doesn't pass muster on my watch: Your use of this site signifies that you accept our Terms and conditions of use.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

What They're Saying




Useful Links