Testy Copy Editors

Our new website is up and running at testycopyeditors.org. This board will be maintained as an archive. Please visit the new site and register. Direct questions to the proprietor, blanp@testycopyeditors.org
It is currently Thu May 02, 2024 5:00 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: newspaper economics
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2005 12:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2002 12:01 am
Posts: 1775
Location: Baltimore
Here's a bitter view of Philadelphia's situation, where the afternoon tab is clinging to life in a hostile arrangement with the Inquirer.
This includes a look at Knight Ridder's history, a prologue to union contract talks, and the trend in annual profits.

I can't vouch for its accuracy.

http://philadelphiaweekly.com/view.php?id=9452


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: newspaper economics
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2005 1:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2002 12:01 am
Posts: 1775
Location: Baltimore
This is long and only for the most curious about the industry's finances. There won't be a test.

Baffled by the term "joint operating agreement," or JOA?
Baffled by what's going on between the papers in Seattle? By what went on in San Francisco in recent years?
Baffled by "media consolidation"?
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/119679_joaelsewhere29.html

A little background on one instance cited:

Joint operating agreements exist (in theory) to keep two papers alive when at least one is struggling financially. Savings are made by sharing expenses.

The a.m. Miami Herald and the p.m. Miami News entered into a joint operating agreement in the mid-1980s. The News was in trouble; The Herald was making a lot of money, but also spending heavily in an unsuccessful effort to gain circulation in Palm Beach County and to hold off the Fort Lauderdale (now South Florida) Sun-Sentinel.

The News eliminated its advertising department. The Herald staff was to sell ads for both papers.

However, that staff just didn't have much success at all selling ads for The News. Executives with Knight Ridder (owner of The Herald) and Cox (owner of The News) soon worked out a tidy deal: Knight Ridder would pay Cox to NOT publish The News. Payments began in 1988 and are to continue until 2021.

Could The News (and the jobs of people I knew) been saved? Likely not, given that region's highly competitive market and late-20th-century media economics.
Are JOAs always what they're claimed to be--for the long-term good of both papers? Likely not.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2005 1:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 12:01 am
Posts: 1189
On a related note, I’m reading Davis Merritt’s book right now, and it really provides a lot of straightforward insight into all of this. (The book, “Knightfall,” is the one that Phillip excerpted in a post the other day and the one that Steve Volk briefly discusses in Wayne’s initial link.)

It's also providing reinforcement to the idea that we can either choose to steadily increase our short-term profit margins (and eventually turn into some other, journalistically bankrupt form of publication — Merritt is more blunt: commit “suicide”) or we can recommit to our ideals of honesty, accuracy and fairness in the name of public service (which, as I read Merritt, seems that it would involve not just the conversion of souls but a massive restructuring of basic corporate lines of communication). At the crux of this decision would be the question of whether we believe there is inherent, perhaps immeasurable value to society in the ongoing practice of journalism.

So, among other things, our uncertainty about the future of newspapers themselves, as threatened by other publishing formats like the Internet, could be only a distraction. The thing for which we should be most terrified is the future of honest journalism.


Last edited by SuchASlot on Fri Jun 24, 2005 1:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Thanks and thanks again
PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 10:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:57 pm
Posts: 158
Location: Boston, MA
Just a thanks to both of you for posting. This stuff is like pure cotton candy to me, and I can't be the only one who thinks so.

I remember very little discussion of this stuff when I was a journalist. I believe it was regarded (at my little alt weekly) as "the publisher's business."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: newspaper economics
PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 1:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2002 12:01 am
Posts: 1775
Location: Baltimore
An interesting speech suggests how newspapers can survive if the industry is willing to make drastic changes, including an acceptance of lower profits:

http://journalism.wlu.edu/Reynolds/mcguire.html

This speech by Tim McGuire can be found at Jim Romenesko's portion of the Poynter's web site.

Poynter.org contains much more than Al's daily story suggestions.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 12, 2005 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 6:30 pm
Posts: 86
Location: Los Angeles
Here's a link to an article from today about JOAs and the rise of new tabloids:

http://www.reason.com/0505/co.mw.free.shtml


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

What They're Saying




Useful Links