This is long and only for the most curious about the industry's finances. There won't be a test.
Baffled by the term "joint operating agreement," or JOA?
Baffled by what's going on between the papers in Seattle? By what went on in San Francisco in recent years?
Baffled by "media consolidation"?
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/119679_joaelsewhere29.html
A little background on one instance cited:
Joint operating agreements exist (in theory) to keep two papers alive when at least one is struggling financially. Savings are made by sharing expenses.
The a.m. Miami Herald and the p.m. Miami News entered into a joint operating agreement in the mid-1980s. The News was in trouble; The Herald was making a lot of money, but also spending heavily in an unsuccessful effort to gain circulation in Palm Beach County and to hold off the Fort Lauderdale (now South Florida) Sun-Sentinel.
The News eliminated its advertising department. The Herald staff was to sell ads for both papers.
However, that staff just didn't have much success at all selling ads for The News. Executives with Knight Ridder (owner of The Herald) and Cox (owner of The News) soon worked out a tidy deal: Knight Ridder would pay Cox to NOT publish The News. Payments began in 1988 and are to continue until 2021.
Could The News (and the jobs of people I knew) been saved? Likely not, given that region's highly competitive market and late-20th-century media economics.
Are JOAs always what they're claimed to be--for the long-term good of both papers? Likely not.