Wabberjocky wrote:
Hasn't ACES done a study at some point? Check out their site.
I think Wabberjocky is referring to Editors Ink. Alas, the database apparently got too snarky and dangerous to live — or so I understood. Any details? It was fun to read while it lasted.
I ran across a reference to Editors Ink by chance this week:
Title: INFLUENCES ON EDITING QUALITY AT THE DAILY OKLAHOMAN , By: Craig, David A., Newspaper Research Journal, 07395329, Summer99, Vol. 20, Issue 3
Database: Communication & Mass Media Complete
Quote:
Against this backdrop, interest in the state of copy desk work is high among both copy editors and newspaper managers. This interest has been evident in the American Society of Newspaper Editors' emphasis in 1995-98 on the state of copy desks,(n3) the founding of the American Copy Editors Society,(n4) recent attention to copy desks and copy editing in the trade press(n5) and responses from more than 100 newspapers to Editors Ink's online survey of copy editors.(n6)
(n6.) The Editors Ink web site includes responses from copy editors at more than 100 newspapers to a survey about organization, workload and other copy desk issues. Editors Ink home page, World Wide Web HYPERLINK
http://www.copydesk.org/ editorsink, 1999.
If you add the *editorsink* to the hyperlink, you won't get anywhere.
(Copy edited to remove evidence of idiotic mistake of mine. [Unaccountably, I called the site "
Editor's Ink."])